Case No. 4A_222/2020 (Supreme Court) | Decision of 16 June 2020 on appeal against O2017_025 | Order of 10 March 2020
This case pops up once in a while. We had reported about it already on this Blog here and here. It relates to a method and system carried out / installed in Switzerland for collecting the heavy vehicle charges. In brief, the plaintiff had been granted legal aid for preparing and filing an infringement complaint. After the first exchange of briefs, the judge-rapporteur had prepared an expert opinion re validity of the patent-in-suit — which did not play out favourable. Accordingly, the FPC withdrew the legal aid for the further course of the proceedings:
The plaintiff / patentee now has to submit the completed reply on his own costs, pay advance court fees of CHF 20’000,– and yet further CHF 50’000,– as security for party compensation. The Supreme Court did not even consider plaintiff’s appeal, for lack of sufficient reasoning. It remains to be seen whether this case will go on, or whether this is the end. Stay tuned.
Reported by Martin WILMING
—
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Case No. 4A_222/2020 (Supreme Court) | Decision of 16 June 2020 on appeal against O2017_025 | Order of 10 March 2020
n/a | (Appellant / Plaintiff) | |
./. | ||
1. | B. GmbH | (Defendant) |
2. | C. SA | (Defendant) |
3. | Swiss Confederation | (Respondent / Notified Party) |
Panel of Judges:
-
- Dr. Christina KISS
Court Clerk:
-
- Dr. Matthias LEEMANN
Representative(s) of Plaintiff:
-
- n/a
Representative(s) of B. GmbH:
-
- Andrea MONDINI (TIMES)
Representative(s) of C. SA:
-
- Dr. Peter K. Neuenschwander (SN&P)
Representative(s) of the Swiss Confederation:
—
DECISION OF THE SUPREME COURT → appeal against FPC order denying (further) legal aid |
|
Case no.: | 4A_222/2020 |
Decision of: | 16 June 2020 |
—
ORDER OF THE FPC → denying (further) legal aid |
|
Case no.: | O2017_025 |
Order of: | 10 March 2020 |
The order is unpublished. Unfortunately. |
—
BE ON THE KNOW